close
Top Panel
1900 to 1910 Jurisprudence
1906 Jurisprudence

Jurisprudence is essentially the theory and philosophy of law. Students of jurisprudence aim to understand the fundamental nature of law, and to analyze its purpose, structure, and application. Jurisprudential scholars (sometimes confusingly referred to as “jurists”) hope to obtain a deeper understanding of the law, the kind of power that it exercises, and its role in human societies. At a practical level, some jurists hope to improve society by studying what the law is, what it ought to be, and how it actually operates. They seek a deeper understanding behind law’s seemingly unpredictable and uncertain nature.

This section reports [STATS] cases decided during the period of [START DATE] to [END DATE], 1906.

Some notable cases decided during this period are:
Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1 Herman vs. Crossfield, Rubert, and Guamis Willard, J. 46
2 Bryan, Landon Co. vs. The American Bank, et al. Willard, J. 42
3 Taco vs. Gay Johnson, J. 31
4 U.S. vs. Orosa Torres, J. 46
5 U.S. vs. Weems Carson, J. 40
6 Cortes vs. Dy-Jia and Dy-Chuanding Willard, J. 42
7 U.S. vs. Mata Carson, J. 41
8 Doliendo vs. Biarnesa Carson, J. 47
9 U.S. vs. Manuel Carson, J. 35
10 Icaza, et al. vs. Flores, et al. Johnson, J. 39
11 U.S. vs. Manabat Carson, J. 35
12 U.S. vs. Cagaoaan, et al. Carson, J. 36
13 Torres and International Bank, et al. vs. Genato Carson, J. 41
14 U.S. vs. Alan Carson, J. 30
15 Fleming and Co., et al. vs. the Lorcha “Nuestra Señora del Carmen” Johnson, J. 34
16 U.S. vs. Salanatin Arellano, C.J. 33
17 U.S. vs. Solis Johnson, J. 40
18 Sparrevohn vs. Bachrach, et al. Willard, J. 30
19 U.S. vs. Cabamngan, et al. Johnson, J. 36
20 U.S. vs. Adriatico Mapa, J. 33
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
Page 1 of 18