THE UNITED STATES, plaintiff-appellee,
vs.
FRANCISCO CASTRO, defendant-appellant.

Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
Manila
En Banc

G.R. No. L-2292
22 March 1906

Teodoro Gonzalez and Deogracias Reyes for appellant.
Office of the Solicitor General for appellee.

CARSON, J.:

The accused in this case in charged with the falsification of private document in that on or about the 25th day of February, 1903, he signed the name of one Regino Sevilla, deceased, to a certain bill of sale of a boat or barangay, the property of the estate of the said Sevilla.

Evidence was introduced at the trial strongly tending to prove that the accused did in fact attach the signature of Regino Sevilla to the document in question for the purpose of defrauding Sevilla’s heirs and depriving them of their property in the said boat. It does not appear, however, that any attempt was made to simulate the genuine signature, and there is evidence of record that Sevilla himself did not know how to write or even to sign his own name. This court, adopting the doctrine laid down by the supreme court of Spain, has frequently held that upon a charge of falsification of attaching the signature of another to a written document conviction can not be had unless it appears that an attempt has been made to simulate the genuine signature of that person; and, therefore, while the accused may have been guilty of the crime of estafa or one of its allied offenses, he can not be convicted of the crime of falsification of a private document as charged in the information and as defined and penalized in article 304, taken in relation with article 300 of the Penal Code. (Decisions of the supreme court of Spain, December 27, 1882, and April 15, 1885; U. S. vs. Paraiso, 1 Phil. Rep., 66; U. S. Roque, id., 372; U. S. vs. Buenaventura, id., 428.)

The accused is acquitted of the crime with which he is charged and the judgment and sentence appealed from is reversed with the costs of both instances, de oficio. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson and Willard, JJ., concur.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Latest Comments

Mumar vs. Dieparine
What an interesting case! Thanks for uploading! smiley
2009 Bar Exam results released
Congratulations to all who passed!
Alconaba, et al. vs. Abinez
This case is pretty short, but interesting nonethe
The Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data
Testing the new comments

Twitter

Site redesign 90% finished. Started major revamp of community platform. Check it out the new site! http://bit.ly/ceZVAW

by The Corpus Juris Friday, 23 April 2010 02:38

Facebook Connect

Announcements

The web development team is currently doing a major revamp of both the site’s presentation and underlying web frameworks. Expect to see some reduced functionality and all-around quirks while the code is sorted out. We promise you’ll be pleasantly surprised when we’re finished!

Visitors Statistics

Visits [+/-]
Today:
Yesterday:
Day before yesterday:
52
453
343

+110
This week:
Last week:
Week before last week:
1270
3777
3397

+380
This month:
Last month:
Month before last month:
52
13734
15236

-1502
This year:
Last year:
101186
96384
+4802

All visits
Since launch 227 918