THE UNITED STATES, plaintiff-appellee,
vs.
FERNANDO MONZONES AND JOAQUIN CAPISTRANO, defendants-appellants.

Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
Manila
En Banc

G.R. No. L-3726
23 September 1907

Fermin Mariano for appellant.
Attorney-General Araneta for appellee.

TRACEY, J.:

One Domingo Rodriguez, travelling through Batangas, was attacked by three robbers, who took from him his horse, his clothes, his cedula and one peso, and held him a prisoner, under guard of one of their number, for four hours in the woods. Rodriguez identified Capistrano as the robber who kept guard over him, but he did not recognized either of his two companions. One of these, Mauricio Zagala, 16 years of age, having been convicted and served an imprisonment of our months for the crime, positively identified Monzones as one of his companions, although he swore that the other was unknown to him. We should be reluctant to accept as sufficient this identification by an associate only were it not that his original story was corroborated in its details by the other testimony before us. In other cases, under like circumstances, we have not hesitated to convict on the testimony of an accomplice. (The United States vs. Ocampo, 4 Phil. Rep., 400; The United States vs. Lim Tico, 4 Phil. Rep., 440; The United States vs. Ocampo, 5 Phil. Rep., 339; The United States vs. Quiamson, 5 Phil. Rep., 444; The United States vs. Dadacay, 6 Phil. Rep., 1.)

Both defendants offered proof of an alibi, not strong enough, however, to establish a defense. The trial court imposed a sentenced of three years eight months and one day. We think that the circumstance of despoblado should be taken into consideration, and for this reason the sentence of both of the defendants is increased to six years ten months and one day of presidio mayor, and as so modified the sentence of the Court of First Instance of Batangas is affirmed, with the costs of this instance. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Johnson, and Willard, JJ., concur.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Latest Comments

Mumar vs. Dieparine
What an interesting case! Thanks for uploading! smiley
2009 Bar Exam results released
Congratulations to all who passed!
Alconaba, et al. vs. Abinez
This case is pretty short, but interesting nonethe
The Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data
Testing the new comments

Twitter

Site redesign 90% finished. Started major revamp of community platform. Check it out the new site! http://bit.ly/ceZVAW

by The Corpus Juris Friday, 23 April 2010 02:38

Facebook Connect

Announcements

The web development team is currently doing a major revamp of both the site’s presentation and underlying web frameworks. Expect to see some reduced functionality and all-around quirks while the code is sorted out. We promise you’ll be pleasantly surprised when we’re finished!

Visitors Statistics

Visits [+/-]
Today:
Yesterday:
Day before yesterday:
539
696
511

+185
This week:
Last week:
Week before last week:
4409
3197
2599

+598
This month:
Last month:
Month before last month:
10839
17571
17181

+390
This year:
Last year:
83003
96384
-13381

All visits
Since launch 209 735