INOCENTE MARTINEZ, plaintiff-appellee,
vs.
G.E. CAMPBELL, ET AL., defendants-appellants.

Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
Manila
En Banc

G.R. No. L-4322
26 March 1908

G.E. Campbell for appellants.
Gibbs and Gale for appellee.

TORRES, J.:

The debtor, Inocente Martinez, whose property was sold at public auction by virtue of the judgment entered by the judge of First Instance of La Laguna, attempted to exercise his right of redemption within the term fixed by section 465 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and on the 29th of March, 1907, offered, to that end, the sum of P479 for the repurchase of the three parcels of land sold, but the sheriff declined to receive the money because it did not agree with the amount named and the instructions given by the purchaser, G.E. Campbell.

The latter, by himself and in the name of the sheriff, admitted the greater part of the allegations contained in the complaint but denied that the sum offered was the said amount, and added as a special defense that the 29th day of March was an official holiday.

The court below found that, under the agreement entered into between the parties, the term for redemption expired on the 31st of March, 1907; that the offer made on the 29th was repeated on the 30th of said month, although the sheriff unlawfully refused to accept it, notwithstanding the fact that the right to redemption might validly have been exercised up to the 30th day of the said month.

No motion for a new trial having been presented, the conclusions contained in the judgment appealed from must be accepted, as the law does not permit a review thereof.

Taking into consideration that the decision of the court below is in accordance with the law, and that no legal reason or ground has been adduced for its reversal, and that it is not proper that the person having the right of redemption should pay interest after the 30th day of March, 1907, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed with the costs against the appellant, It is the duty of the court below to appoint a reasonable term within which the plaintiff shall pay in the amount due, with interest thereon up to the 30th day of March, 1907, only. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Mapa, Carson, Willard, and Tracey, JJ., concur.
Johnson. J., disqualified.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Latest Comments

Mumar vs. Dieparine
What an interesting case! Thanks for uploading! smiley
2009 Bar Exam results released
Congratulations to all who passed!
Alconaba, et al. vs. Abinez
This case is pretty short, but interesting nonethe
The Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data
Testing the new comments

Twitter

Site redesign 90% finished. Started major revamp of community platform. Check it out the new site! http://bit.ly/ceZVAW

by The Corpus Juris Friday, 23 April 2010 02:38

Facebook Connect

Announcements

The web development team is currently doing a major revamp of both the site’s presentation and underlying web frameworks. Expect to see some reduced functionality and all-around quirks while the code is sorted out. We promise you’ll be pleasantly surprised when we’re finished!

Visitors Statistics

Visits [+/-]
Today:
Yesterday:
Day before yesterday:
55
553
515

+38
This week:
Last week:
Week before last week:
608
3397
2805

+592
This month:
Last month:
Month before last month:
9347
15236
17571

-2335
This year:
Last year:
96747
96384
+363

All visits
Since launch 223 479